This record is being processed for inclusion into GeoRef. It may not yet have been indexed, given a translated title, or checked by a GeoRef editor.
Evaluation of impacts of future climate change and water use scenarios on regional hydrology
Get full text
|Authors:||Chang, Seungwoo; Graham, Wendy; Geurink, Jeffrey; Wanakule, Nisai; Asefa, Tirusew|
|Author Affiliations:||Primary: |
University of Florida, Water Institute, Gainesville, FL, United States
Tampa Bay Water, United States
|Volume Title:||Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS)|
|Source:||Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS), 22(9), p.4793-4813. Publisher: Copernicus GmbH on behalf of the European Geosciences Union, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany. ISSN: 1027-5606|
|Note:||In English. 97 refs.; illus., incl. 7 tables|
|Summary:||General circulation models (GCMs) have been widely used to simulate current and future climate at the global scale. However, the development of frameworks to apply GCMs to assess potential climate change impacts on regional hydrologic systems, ability to meet future water demand, and compliance with water resource regulations is more recent. In this study eight GCMs were bias-corrected and downscaled using the bias correction and stochastic analog (BCSA) downscaling method and then used, together with three ET0 methods and eight different water use scenarios, to drive an integrated hydrologic model previously developed for the Tampa Bay region in western central Florida. Variance-based sensitivity analysis showed that changes in projected streamflow were very sensitive to GCM selection, but relatively insensitive to ET0 method or water use scenario. Changes in projections of groundwater level were sensitive to both GCM and water use scenario, but relatively insensitive to ET0 method. Five of eight GCMs projected a decrease in streamflow and groundwater availability in the future regardless of water use scenario or ET method. For the business as usual water use scenario all eight GCMs indicated that, even with active water conservation programs, increases in public water demand projected for 2045 could not be met from ground and surface water supplies while achieving current groundwater level and surface water flow regulations. With adoption of 40 % wastewater reuse for public supply and active conservation four of the eight GCMs indicate that 2045 public water demand could be met while achieving current environmental regulations; however, drier climates would require a switch from groundwater to surface water use. These results indicate a high probability of a reduction in future freshwater supply in the Tampa Bay region if environmental regulations intended to protect current aquatic ecosystems do not adapt to the changing climate. Broad interpretation of the results of this study may be limited by the fact that all future water use scenarios assumed that increases in water demand would be the result of intensification of water use on existing agricultural, industrial, and urban lands. Future work should evaluate the impacts of a range of potential land use change scenarios, with associated water use change projections, over a larger number of GCMs.|
|Subjects:||Agriculture; Aquatic environment; Climate; Climate change; Demand; Ecosystems; Evapotranspiration; Fresh water; Future; General circulation models; Ground water; Hydrology; Industry; Irrigation; Levels; Monthly variations; Pumping; Sensitivity analysis; Simulation; Statistical analysis; Streamflow; Surface water; Urban environment; Waste water; Water management; Water resources; Water supply; Water use; Florida; Southwest Florida Water Management District; Tampa Bay; United States; CMIP5 models; Tampa Bay Water|
|Coordinates:||N272700 N280200 W0822200 W0825100|
N264500 N293000 W0812000 W0824500
|Copyright Information:||GeoRef, Copyright 2020 American Geosciences Institute. Reference includes data from Copernicus Gesellschaft, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany|
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!